– There are those who criticize the interview of Gennaro Sangiuliano to the Tg1 granted to director Chiocci. Someone whispers: “We hadn’t even seen a 15-minute live broadcast of interviews with the popes.”. Lerner jokes: “A real journalistic scoop that will forever illuminate his career and that will remain among the most glorious pages in the history of public television news.”. Well, here we need to clarify. If we look at the interview from Sangiuliano’s point of view, then perhaps there is some reason in those who believe that subjecting oneself to such torture, in front of millions of viewers, forced to display one’s sins of bed to public ridicule, eyes downcast and excuses to the “woman of my life”, was not a very wise choice. If Meloni wanted to punish him, she succeeded admirably. But observing the live broadcast from a journalistic point of view, the choice to dedicate so much space to him was wise, correct, spot on. A scoop is a scoop, and this was one: Sangiuliano revealed that he had resigned, that he had had an affair with Maria Rosaria Boccia and that he fears what will come out of the chats with this woman. In fact, today all the newspapers are talking about nothing else. And in fact Lerner is jealous.
– It is forbidden to publish the ordinances custody precautionary in its entirety. No “squeeze on freedom of the press”, but the sacrosanct barrier to a great chaos that journalists have not been able to self-regulate. The publication of those documents, which in 99.9% only report the version of the accusation without the unfortunate arrested person having yet had the opportunity to defend himself, fuels an avalanche of articles thanks to quotes, wiretaps, dialogues. In Italy the media trial is a fact and we must find all ways to avoid it. Or at least to postpone it until the first preliminary hearing.
– Incipit of Republic: “The Meloni government brandishes the axe against freedom of the press. And it does so precisely in coincidence with the Boccia-Sangiuliano case“. Explain to me, Liana Milella, what the hell does the Sangiuliano case have to do with the precautionary custody orders? Nothing, it’s gossip and journalistic indiscretions, without any intervention from the judiciary. On the contrary: for once the newspapers have done their job by digging into the minister’s heart without having to rely on the magistrates’ spy “papers”.
– Beppe Cricket returns to the charge and bombards Giuseppe Conte. It is impossible that the political fracture between the Founder and the former Prime Minister can be mended, therefore the options – the comedian is right – are two: either with me or against me. Which means that after the October congress either the M5S will split in two, with a legal war to own the symbol, or a new movement will be born. At this point the “easiest” solution for Giuseppi. We’ll see.
– I’m serious: but why do politicians write books? I mean, aren’t readers satisfied with YouTube videos, social media posts, newspaper articles and TV interviews?
– It should be acknowledged that Matthew Renziwhen things get serious, to have a minimum sense of state. If von der Leyen appoints Fitto as vice president and gives him the Economy delegations, Renew Europe is wrong to consider it a disgrace.The opposition – says Renzi – has the duty to defend the Italian commissioner“. Also because it remains so even in the event of a change of government.
– How many times, dear colleagues, have you reloaded the Instagram page of Mary Rosary Bowl? Here. It’s hard to say if he has organizational skills, but his communication skills are undeniable. He held us all in his hand. Genius.
– Question, little question: but implying that you have videos, audio and text messages about the relationship is configured as the sweetened and not dirty version of the revenge porn?
– Sangiuliano will be made a Saint. And do you know by whom? By Will be Judge And In the Trocchia who, already pardoned by colleagues who treated their story with kid gloves, now see their misdeeds slide to the bottom of the inevitable hierarchy of news. Fortunelli.
– Massacre of Father DugnanoRiccardo to the investigating judge: “I didn’t have it in for my family”. Ah, just think what he would have done if he had hated them.
– The massacre of Father Dugnano It is horrible, terrible, inhuman. Dad, mom and little brother stabbed to death after playing PlayStation. Senseless. Newspapers, psychologists and experts have launched into learned analyses of the case, on youth problems, on the whys and wherefores of such a crime. Obviously without ever having spoken to the killer. We always look for a “justification” perhaps because we cannot surrender to the fact that in life there is the banality of evil. Wars, famines, murders, misfortunes. You can have all the psychologists, UN and international institutions and yet you will not be able to eradicate every shred of evil. What you must not do, however, is trivialize the act. And justify it with the minor age of the killer. It is unbearable. Roberto is 17 years old, not 10. He is almost a man and in a few months he would have gotten a driving license, voted, made important life choices. He is not a boy. In this case, minority cannot be considered as a mitigating factor: there are peers who at 17 – sometimes even earlier – work, leave home, take on responsibilities.
– PS: Also noteworthy is the perfect timing of Ilaria Salis who the other day asked for the abolition of prisons for minors.
Question: Do we send the Paderno Dugnano murderer to adult prison or do you find him a place?
– It surprises me that Dago he has not yet gone to look for it as Sangiuliano recounted in his book Hillary the relationship between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky.