Prodi and the 5 things that do not come back, what a fool Nardella and the USA: therefore, today …

– but Ernesto Maria Ruffini When does it become the leader of the center? When he left the Revenue Agency and the newspapers they dedicated every page possible to him seemed the new …

Prodi and the 5 things that do not come back, what a fool Nardella and the USA: therefore, today ...


– but Ernesto Maria Ruffini When does it become the leader of the center? When he left the Revenue Agency and the newspapers they dedicated every page possible to him seemed the new Savior of the homeland. Has he already eclipsed into an amen?

– Do you know what is the most shocking detail of the case of the chat in which the US administration exchanged messages on the imminent attack on the Houti, complete with secret plans, chat in which a journalist ended up by mistake? The fact that the comments were at the level of the sports bar, complete with emoticon. It almost makes shiver.

– But then: how does it come to mind to lie by saying that Attack plans have never been sharedknowing that the journalist, before revealing the hole, will have made 12 thousand screenshots of the conversations? It seems to me that Vance & Co are applying the Prodi methodand – although knowing they can be blocked – they still prefer to deny the truth. Which, however, only feeds the story. I don’t think a great idea.

– while European governments are committed to making the voters digest the idea of ​​a military mission of peacekeeping In Ukraine, Kiev’s negotiator says they want people ready to “fight”. I don’t think the best way to convince European public opinions …

– And in fact Emmanuel Macron to justify the sending of troops comes to claim that it is a “pacifist approach” to send soldiers to Ukraine. “They will not go to the front to fight” but will be unfolded “to guarantee lasting peace”. Are you serious? Have you ever seen armies that do not fight? No.

– Do you want to know who the prize for the timeliness goes? TO Dario Nardella. Who yesterday around 7pm issues this note: “Solidarity to Professor Romano Prodi for the attack he has undergone in these hours. Everyone saw the dynamics of the meeting with the journalist Mediaset who attacked the professor with sudden questions and with provocative tone. Journalists and freedom of the press must always be protected, but also good education is a sacrosanct principle “. Then two hours after La7 airs the images with which” the dynamics of the meeting “invented by Romano is blossomed by the facts. Raisted again, again, Daries.

– Apart from the “sudden questions” and “the provocative tone” only Nardella saw them.

Maximum Giannini Watch the video that Sbuggiarda Prodi and, while criticizing the professor, manages not to apologize for the unbearable tweet with which he had defined the poor Lavinia Goldsmiths A “assassin” of regime journalism. Look: the former Paternalian Premier did not commit the real violence against the journalist. The various Giannini, Vitalba Azzolini, Enrico Letta and all those who questioned the version of the journalist, made the real violence. Who, without whining, had simply said: he took my hair, he didn’t have to do it, apologize. And Prodi could have closed the case trivially admitting the error, writing a repentant SMS and many greetings. It can happen to lose the jug. Instead he denied everything, said the false, the famous “hand on the shoulder”, and all his courtiers ran behind him accusing – in fact – the goldsmith of having lied. Instead no. You believed to him and sided she, who was right to sell. And you did it by party. Convinced that Network4, just because they don’t think like you, they are sold that tell lies. You behaved like those who do not listen to women victims of violence, the real ones, and that so criticized in your respectable pieces. Now get off the pedestal, thanks.

– also theOrder of journalistslike the FNSI, writes a skimpy note on the Prodi case only after the publication of the news on the insult (“piece of m ***”) by Giovanni Donzelli to the reporter of Done. I imagine relief. The relief of having an excuse to give a blow to the barrel and one in the circle, without having to attack only Prodi or continue in the impaired silence. The fact remains that the order of journalists, useless and abolishing body, which however should guarantee the category, has remained silent for three very damned days.

– No never the podcast of Massimo Giannini You must listen to it, because it is the proven proof that the snobbery that permeates the Ventotene manifesto These are drunk the magic potion like Obelix. The question of Lavinia Orefici, calm and not at all aggressive, according to ours would have had a “clear provocative flavor”. Obviously, asked by a “sent, in spite of himself” chronicler (as if it were a half stupid) with the aim of “provoking it” by responding to “logic that escape those of a constructive journalism”. If, on the other hand, Giacomo Salvini publishes the private chats of Fratelli d’Italia, and a “piece of M” by Donzelli is caught, then magically the chronicler becomes “correct person” who “had only the wrong” of writing a book on the government party “. Says Giannini that the task of” free information “is to” ask questions, very often uncomfortable “. But, apparently, the reasoning is only valid for them. Of the “regime assassins”.

– Giannini gets into question that time when Ignazio There Russian I pestò, according to the credible reconstruction of Corrado Formiglibut contested by the then minister, the feet at the invitation of Annozero. The Russian was wrong and made a mistake today Prodi. The problem is that while you immediately believed in the version of Formigli, this time you treated Orefici as a liar.

– All politicians unravel and all insult, from all sides. The point is that they are all condemned, without distinctions.

– the excuse of Prodi are not excuse. First: the magic word is missing. Second: he admits the error of having touched his hair, but he looks good to make ames for the sensational lie with which he tried to passed off an inadmissible gesture for a paternalist touch of the shoulder. Third: Prodi writes that he realized only “seeing the shooting” of having “almost mechanically transported that gesture in a different area“, Which means everything and nothing and has the sole purpose of confusing the waters (can someone really believe that he has not noticed that he has taken the strand of hair?).

Fourth: the professor reiterates that he has neither attacked nor intimidated the reporter, but he is one Excusatio Non petita since nobody has ever supported him. Quinto: nobody questioned the story of Prodi and nobody derives it, and it is obvious that “the whole life” matters; But your story does not allow you to lie and think of passing it smoothly. The times have ended.