– You’ll have to settle for a light version of this column of ours, thanks to migraines.
– Let’s start from M5Snow a shadow of himself and perhaps even a caricature. He’s right David Casaleggioson of the founder Gianroberto. Now only the name of the Movement remains and perhaps not for long. Of course: all parties change skin. Even the League in its own way has reviewed the historic battles, but without losing the underlying spirit: secession having been abandoned, the defense of the north has remained, then autonomy, then VAT numbers, which are in any case the expression of that working north even without the myth of Alberto da Giussano. The game of Beppe Grillo It was based on some principles: one is worth one, activists must participate in the choices of the program, the elected officials do not warm the chair for too long. Nothing is left.
– In Bologna a guy destroyed a work of art, or supposedly such, of Ai Weiwei. And I to this Vaclac Pisvejc I would like to give him an award. Not so much for damaging something objectively ugly, but because he claims his raids as “performances”. Right. Bravo. Encore. In the world where perception counts more than reality, if certain modern works are considered “art”, if certain “performances” are applauded by the public, who are we to say that this gentleman, by destroying porcelain cubes, is not in his own way creating a work of art?
– In the Musumeciafter the flood in Emilia Romagna, lets us know that the government is probably thinking about an “obligation for families to take out home insurance against natural disasters”. Like fire insurance. Or car insurance. Now: that the State cannot compensate anyone whose home is submerged by water is a good and just thing, let’s be clear. But I don’t know if the insurance obligation is the right move, because it puts the burden of the failure to “secure the territory” on the private individual (even those who live in non-flood zones) which should be the responsibility of the State and for which we already pay taxes. In essence: it would be a mini-tax on property. The best solution would be to leave freedom of choice to the citizen and then, however, if something happens and you don’t have the policy, goodbye. Whoever it affects doesn’t frown.
– The case Sangiuliano–Bowl is colored with new revelations. In the complaint filed by him there are chats with her, between hypotheses of pregnancies, text messages, private conversations. But is it really convenient for the former minister, now that he has lost his job, to get into this mess? Wouldn’t it have been better to let it all drop, wait for the next scandal when everything will end up in oblivion? Try to think, Gennaro, of Sara Giudice and Nello Trocchia. He was their lifesaver: when the Boccia scandal broke, no one spoke of the alleged rape anymore. Let the story slide, without rehashing it. In the Open Arms case, the NGOs are asking Salvini for a million euros in compensation. If it weren’t a serious thing, it would be laughable.
– Now the Courier interview more often Velasco that Renzi.
– Interesting survey on Salvini: the majority of Italians, about 48%, think that condemning the former Minister of the Interior for the Open Arms case is stupid. Evidently, Italians are more reasonable than prosecutors. The story of the no-gender bathrooms at the Trieste school is paradoxical. So. Let’s take the bizarre Lgbtqxyz+ theories at face value, according to which there are not two genders but a myriad. Can you explain to me why, given that there are perhaps one or two kids who do not identify as male or female, everyone should end up in mixed bathrooms? Where is the equity? If you really want to be inclusive, leave the bathroom for men, the one for women and add a third colorful toilet where everyone chooses to enter according to their perceived sex at that moment. By erasing the male-female dichotomy in the toilets, they also took away women’s last right: that of going to bathrooms that are not pissed on the floor by dirty men.
– If
Elodie claims her nudity, see the Pirelli calendar, everyone applauds her. If Melania Trump does the same with her past shots, the media either doesn’t talk about it or does so with some dormant irritation. Why?