Dear Director Feltri,
Donald Trump’s proposal to move the Palestinians from Gaza to transform the strip into a sort of tourist paradise favoring its economic development risks undermining the truce between Israel and Hamas, also putting the delivery of the hostages by the militiamen at risk. Moreover, it seems nonsense to me. In short, I do not understand its meaning. The countries that should accommodate the Palestinians, such as Egypt, have refused and rebelled against the proposal of the President of the United States and have no wrong. What do you think about it?
Francesca Lupi
Dear Francesca,
I really like President Trump, who is contributing in a tangible way to the creation of the conditions for peace also on the Ukrainian front. The news of the phone call between him and Putin bodes well, as it actually marks the resumption of contacts between the West and Russia, an approach, a disgela, which is necessary preconception because the war has end. Trump’s weight was also remarkable in the context of the conflict in the Middle East. In short, this man was said to be said and it is still said that he constitutes a global danger, yet we have been better since he settled in the place of Biden.
However, I don’t even share his idea of moving the Palestinians from Gaza to start the reconstruction. First of all, the Palestinians have just returned to the strip and in what remains of their homes, largely razed to the ground. You only have to be rubble, but they are pleased to have returned to you. I saw on TV some interviews made by reporters on site to the people who smiled home. I was struck by the words of a woman who said: “I no longer have a house but I am happy to return”, interpreting a collective feeling. We are all linked to Christmas places, which represent our nest, even when the roof is missing, that is the place where our heart is. Leaving thousands and thousands of individuals to remove the rubble and rebuild an area seems to me to be bullshit. The basic perspective is incorrect, that is, we look at the Palestinians as individuals who have to deliver home for this to be renovated and then possibly go back to ended works, turnkey.
It is a commercial perspective, dangerous from a political point of view as it generates in the Palestinian people the suspicion that someone wants to care, that is, that someone intends to use the excuse of the reconstruction to ignite them. And this risk, the risk of being misunderstood and fomenting certain fears, must be avoided, since it is incompatible with the climate of peace that we intend to create. If anything, I think that the Palestinian people have to contribute with their own hands to the reconstruction, it must be an integral part of it, author and vehicle. The workforce must not be imported, it is already available in the area. And the Palestinians have a great need to work. It is through work that developing and economic growth are promoted.
So what better opportunity for reconstruction to produce employment? The work always saves, save from hunger, also save from despair.
Therefore, that it is the Palestinians who reconstruct the strip, who carry out the Trump project to make that place a sort of cutting -edge coastal paradise. Prospero and happy.