But in what hands are we? The question arises spontaneously. The news is now known all over the world: the administration of Donald Trump has added a journalist, the director of Atlantic Jeffrey Goldbergto one Restricted chat where he was planning the massive attack on March 15 against dozens of Houthi stations in Yemen. Embarrassing, simply. Goldberg himself in an article on the site of the magazine he directed: a testimony of inadequacy visible to the naked eye, a gigantic alarm for national security (and not only) to make this bad impression at the top of the stars and stripes.
Let’s go degrees. “On March 15, just before 2pm, the world learned that the United States was bombing Houthi in Yemen. I, however, had already learned the news two hours before. And the reason for this anticipation is that, at 11:44 on the same day, the defense secretary Pete Hegseth had sent me an SMS containing the action plan. operations “. This is the story of Goldberg, who ended up in the chat together with the greatest exponents of Pentagonto the vice president JD Vance and other high -level officials.
“Can’t it be true?” The more than understandable comment of Golberg, who reconstructed the story. It all started on March 11, when, four days before sending the message, he received a request for adhesion to a chat from a certain Michael Waltz. Initially doubtful about the truthfulness of the request, he thought it was a joke, but in the end he accepted. Thus discovering that he entered a group called “Houthi PC Small Group”, which included the leaders of the Pentagon and national security.
For days, unaware of the fact that Goldberg was also present, the chat members exchanged high security messagescontaining details on the times of the attacks, the weapons to be used, discussions on the morale of troops and even criticisms of Europe called “parasite” by Trump’s deputy. The chat was not only a channel for operational planning, but also a place of exchange on strategic decisions relating to the imminent military actions.
In the end, Goldberg decided to get out of the chat. After the publication of his article, almost ten days later, the spokesman for the National Security Council Brian Hughes confirmed the accident, if this can be stamped, defining the inclusion of the Goldberg number in the chat as an error. He added that an investigation is underway to clarify how it could have happened. Donald Trump, while declaring that he is not aware of the incident, took the opportunity to attack “The Atlantic”, calling her a “terrible magazine” and suggesting that the fault of the journalist was.
- Trump, a boomerang for the right?
Experts stressed that this type of news escape could have serious implications for national security, The secrecy of the operations and the integrity of military planning, and that a similar error would never have had to happen. It was not a simple oversight, but a clear sign of how much sensitive information can be compromised. Goldberg does not exclude that the accident can lead to serious legal consequences for chat managers.
Based on the first information circulated, Mike Waltz may have to be forced to resign. The councilor could be pushed to take a step back to prevent President Trump from being put in a “bad position”. The last word will be up to the Tycoon, who yesterday said to continue having the “maximum trust” in Waltz. One thing is certain: Whoever made a nonsense of this type must be sent awaybecause it is unable to defend the secrecy of the most important nation in the world.
Franco Lodige, March 25, 2025
TheVermilion.com is also on WhatsApp. Simply click here to register for the channel and always be updated (free).
The US article, the secret attachment plans in chat: in what hands are we? It comes from TheVermilion.com.