Amnesty's big hoax about the Palestinian who died in prison

That Amnesty International has lost the credibility it had enjoyed in the past and has become one of the megaphones of the propaganda of the absurd is clear to all men and women who have …

Amnesty's big hoax about the Palestinian who died in prison

That Amnesty International has lost the credibility it had enjoyed in the past and has become one of the megaphones of the propaganda of the absurd is clear to all men and women who have a bit of critical sense and a minimum of intellectual honesty left.

Let's say that when it comes to Israel, the organization that claims to be non-governmental gives its best/worst depending on your point of view. As far as I'm concerned, with the last post he really reached his negative record to the point that the men and women who still have a bit of critical sense and a minimum of intellectual honestythose I invoked at the beginning, cannot help but take note of how much venom and falsehood they have managed to express once again towards the Jewish State.

Only state in the world for Jews.
The only democratic state in the Middle East.

The post is about Walid Daqqa died in prison at the age of 62 due to bone cancer.
Walid Daqqa, take note of this name, which is described in the post like this:

The death in custody of Walid Daqqa, a 62-year-old Palestinian writer who was the Prisoner Palestinian longer lived in Israeli prisons after 38 years of captivity, it is a cruel reminder of Israel's contempt for Palestinians' right to life. It is heartbreaking that Walid died in Israeli custody despite numerous calls for his urgent release on humanitarian grounds following his 2022 bone marrow cancer diagnosis and the fact that he had already served his original sentence. The Israeli authorities must now return his body to his family without delay so that they can give him a peaceful and dignified burial and allow them to mourn his death without intimidation.

To comment on this entire series of information, it is necessary to put things in order and write a premise. Let's start with the premise: The “contempt for the lives of Palestinians” on the Israeli side is confirmed by the hundreds of sick people who for years, both from Judea and Samaria and from the Gaza Strip, before the start of the war, were treated free of charge in Israeli hospitals. Israeli healthcare, financed by the taxes of the citizens of the Jewish State, has always taken responsibility for the right spirit of humanity of the seriously ill in the territories controlled by the ANP and by Hamas they couldn't have. In those of the PNA because the billions of dollars of aid received in recent years have served everything, above all to fill the pockets of the corrupt, except to invest in hospital facilities, and in the Gaza Strip to purchase weapons, dig tunnels, train martyrdom and, above all, as has been well demonstrated, to transform what were supposed to be hospitals into terror bases and collection centers for all types of weapons coming from all over the world through the tunnels that connect the Strip with the Egyptian Sinai. But Amnesty International doesn't say this.

Let's get back to us. In the post, Walid Daqqa he is initially described as a 62-year-old Palestinian writer and the longest-serving Palestinian prisoner in Israeli prisons after 38 years of captivity. If we needed proof that bad weed never dies, or dies with difficulty, we have found it.

Amnesty also says: It is heartbreaking that Walid died in Israeli custody despite numerous calls for his urgent release on humanitarian grounds following his 2022 bone marrow cancer diagnosis and the fact that he had already served his original sentence. Here too there are inaccuracies, Walid had on his shoulders a life sentence transformed into 37 years in prison to which three others had been added for smuggling mobile phones within the prison facility. 37 years in prison were not enough for him and he wanted, of his own free will, to add an extra bonus. Why not please him? The term heartbreaking was also used, but it was used badly, heartbreaking it is what the terrorist was convicted of. I'll get to that in a moment.

Amnesty also says: “The Israeli authorities must now return his body to his family without delay so that they can give him a peaceful and dignified burial and allow them to mourn his death without intimidation”.

In this case the term heartbreaking it should have been used on the reason for the conviction, on what he had done and that is: in 1984, Moshe Tamam, a 19 year old soldier who was kidnapped by a Palestinian terrorist cell led by Walid Daqqa. Moshe Tamam he suffered terrible things torture, his eyes were gouged outbroke all his fingers and toes, fractured his legs by beating them in several places and, finally, before shooting him in the chest and throwing him like rubbish in an olive grove, the terrorists led by the writer first emasculated and then castrated.

TheVermilion.com is also on Whatsapp. Simply click here to subscribe to the channel and always be updated (free).