The Middle East and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict which has now expanded into a Muslim-Jewish conflict are incomprehensible if each fact is evaluated in isolation from the context and from other almost contemporary events or events. But the error, which sometimes smells a mile away of malice, is frequently committed by the Western media which they claim to present a completed puzzle while pretending not to notice that some pieces of the puzzle have either been lost or have been artfully hidden under the tablecloth.
We do not pretend to be so good as to reconstruct the entire puzzle, but to point out four pieces of the puzzle itself that have been presented as if they were isolated from each other, when the exact opposite is actually true, as clearly emerges in the moment which attempts to fit them rationally within the entire framework of reference. The four elements are: the hunt for the Jew in the streets of Amsterdam; the re-edition of the book by the Egyptian journalist of Jewish origin Bat Ye’or, first to coin the term Eurabialater made famous by Oriana Fallaci; there Qatar’s decision to expel Hamas and its representatives, including political ones; the order announced by the nascent staff of the new president of the United States, Donald Trump, of subject international funding to American universities to strict controlespecially the most prestigious ones; financing often conveyed through dark tracks and coming in the vast majority from Muslim countries.
A preordained and planned Jew hunt
The first piece of our puzzle, the one relating to the hunt for Jews in the streets of Amsterdam on the occasion of a non-random match (the home team, Ajax, is traditionally considered linked to the Jewish community to the point that its fans were ready for a twinning with the visiting fans from Israel); the attack by the young Muslims and their supporters had nothing improvised about it. The exact opposite is true: Holland (the Holland of Anne Frank and the Nazi occupation) is one of the countries in which the rooting of second and third generations of Muslim immigrants is most solidto the point of counting on strong complicity even in the institutions, in some “strategic” categories (taxi drivers) and probably in the police forces.
- Welcome to Eurabia: Amsterdam scenes show us what we are becoming
Furthermore, there was nothing surprising or unpredictable about the attack in the manner in which the hunt for the Jew was carried out: the cliché was and has been identical to that of the Por-Pal demonstrations which took place in the last year, in the silence and implicit support also of important opinion makers (the Vatican which, moreover, has totally forgotten the hostages including missing children in Gaza) in all European cities including the Italian ones (even after the events in Amsterdam with the corollary of the beatification of Sinwar and of the guilt of the entire world Jewish community and not just of Israel, in one escalation that first targeted Netanyahu, then Israel and then the entire global Jewish community).
The Eurabia desired by the Eurobureaucracy
And this is connected to second piece of our puzzle. Thirteen years after the first Italian edition, the publisher Lindau republishes with a new introductory essay by the author, Eurabia, by Bat Ye’or. The book whose title was made famous by the courage of Oriana Fallaci supports a thesis that is anything but far-fetched: from the end of the ’60s to the beginning of the ’70s, Europe (headed in particular by France, the Belgium and Holland itself with growing support from the Scandinavian countries) has pursued and also fueled with financial resources used by its power lobbies a policy of global integration and cooperation with the Arab world as opposed to Atlantic politics dominant and obviously with an excellent common basis of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. The essay argues that precisely that idea of Europe, first the EEC and then the European Union, aimed at the construction of an economic and military block in theory opposed to the United States. It was and is the Europe we find ourselves in today, still substantially unrealistic in its attempt to establish a strong economic and military block capable of opposing the United States and obviously Israel. Again according to Bat Ye’or, for half a century now Europe has been “planning” with the countries of the Arab League “the merger of the two shores of the Mediterranean into a new, monstrous agglomeration” which Bat Ye’or has suggestively called «Eurabia», the result of the so-called «Euro-Arab Dialogue», the massive opening of the borders to immigrants of the Muslim faith and the inexorable transformation of the European continent increasingly subservient to the cultural standards of the Arab world and increasingly willing to give up its roots as well as part of its sovereignty over colonized territorial areas.
- Brussels teaches: we risk an Islamized Eurabia
Once triggered (with a key role also played by European officials who were part of the pro-Nazi elite) the process never stopped, making anti-Zionism the glue of a cultural legitimation of Islam, of a chain of historical falsehoods on the Middle East giving birth to a dominant “Palestenism”. as an ideological (and economic) glue.
Ultimately, mutatis mutandi, the Abraham Accords desired by Trump and destined to be relaunched by Trump 2, have a mirror value with respect to that Arab-European plan: through a strong alliance with the United States the objective is to build a new Western-Islamic continent including not only the monarchies of the Gulf but also Israelas a technological, military spearhead and model for liberation from fundamentalism. A project that highlights once again the reasons for the massacre of October 7th and the already foreseen Israeli reaction: breaking Abraham’s new front which cuts off European and Eurabian ambitions.
Why Qatar expels its friend Hamas
But as has often happened in history, Europe’s long-term plans crash against Anglo-Saxon pragmatism: it is here, with the third piece of the puzzle, that it is curious, to say the least, that the media (Italian in particular) have devoted so little attention to two pieces of news that say a lot about the American desire to impose a new order and isolate fundamentalism. Qatar, which has always been a direct, indirect and shadow financier of the Palestinian and non-Palestinian armed and terrorist fringes (Hamas but also Hezbollah) and also Iran’s spearhead in the Arabian peninsula, has announced the decision to expel Hamas men from its territory. Decision with immediate effect which deprives the terrorist movements (those of the motto “from the river to the sea”, of the destruction of Israel, moreover – as highlighted by many polls – a common hope of all the large Islamic communities settled in Europe) of the financial pillar as well which allowed them to also manage a successful system of forced social assistance.
- “Black October”: Israel’s dilemma, the long hand of Iran and Qatar
And at the same time, the choice of the nascent Trump administration cannot help but make us reflect, as already attempted during the tycoon’s first mandate, to place under very strict control the river of overt or shadow funding that flows into American universities (the same happens in Europe) and which has generated a dominant anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic, pro-Islamic culture.
Trump will block suspicious funds for US universities
In Europe (and this is just one example among many) the Qatar Development Fund donated three million pounds to the Thatcher fund of Oxford University, established in memory of the British prime minister, Qatar donated eleven million to St Antony’s College in Oxford, where Tariq Ramadan taught. Oxford’s £75 million Center for Islamic Studies has been backed by twelve Muslim countries, and an £8.4 million donation from a Kuwaiti foundation is just one of the sums that have reached the London School of Economics, where a scandal has already erupted for 1.5 million from the Gaddafi Foundation. But in the United States where pro-Pal university support is global, the NCRI (one of the major US data analysis agencies) has published a report according to which, from 2014 to 2019, 13 billion dollars undeclared to the Ministry of Education flowed into the coffers of 200 US universities. The main donors are some foreign states: Qatar (2.7 billion), China (1.2 billion), Saudi Arabia (1 billion), United Arab Emirates (about half a billion). The list goes on, and it is curious to note how voluminous the donations from Middle Eastern autocracies have been. As expected, the main beneficiaries of this river of money were the large private universities of the North-East: Harvard, Yale, Cornwell.
- US universities transformed into Hamas strongholds
Six American universities now also have their own campuses in Doha’s Education City: Georgetown, Carnegie Mellon, Virginia Commonwealth, Cornell, Northwestern and Texas A&M. The state-run Qatar Foundation funds the campuses and staff. Two hundred American colleges and universities withheld information about thirteen billion dollars in foreign contributions, many of them from authoritarian Islamic countries. Furthermore, although correlation is not causation, the number of anti-Semitic incidents on a campus does have a relationship to whether that university has received funding (disclosed or otherwise) from Middle Eastern regimes. And the fourth piece of the puzzle also fell into place.
The article Checkmate in four moves for Eurabia comes from Nicola Porro.