doubts about the Lebanese who condemned Jerusalem

Second A Watchthe non-governmental organization that analyzes the work of the United Nations, Nawaf Salemthe president of the international court, is not an impartial figure and should be challenged. Not that the other members of …

doubts about the Lebanese who condemned Jerusalem

Second A Watchthe non-governmental organization that analyzes the work of the United Nations, Nawaf Salemthe president of the international court, is not an impartial figure and should be challenged. Not that the other members of the court, lowercase intentional, are any better. But let’s go in order. Nafaw Salem is the former ambassador of Lebanon to the UN and everyone knows that in addition to being formally at war with Israel, the land of cedars is dominated by Hezbollah. A Shiite terrorist organization that with its political wing is in parliament but which, in fact, with its other wing, the military one, calls the shots in the country, occupies the south and from there launches continuous attacks towards the Israeli Galilee and Golan.

In your opinion: Who does Your Honor take orders from? Come on, a little effort and a pinch of intellectual honesty the answer comes spontaneously. If the answer does not come, it can be found in the biography of Your Honor who during his career as Lebanese ambassador to the United Nations voted 210 times against Israel. Of course, as an ambassador there is nothing strange, but some doubts about the impartiality of the judge materialize before the eyes of those who reason. Therefore these doubts would have been enough to have him challenged as a judge, let alone as president of the court. But that is not all.

Good Salem, as a good ambassador of Hezbollah to the UN, sorry of Lebanon to the UN, has always voted in favor of Iran and against the resolutions that defended the victims of the Ayatollah regime and, always following the directives from Tehran, excused from Beirut, has always voted in favor of Assad. Do you remember Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian dictator who passes himself off as president? Well, in all the resolutions that concerned the conflict in Syria, it was a civil war that produced at least 580 thousand deaths and among these also thousands of Palestinians, the good Salem, excuse me, Your Honor at the time of the facts ambassador, has always voted in favor of the one who did not hesitate to massacre his own people.

As for the thousands of Palestinians who died during that war, little and badly was said about them, in fact it is no secret to anyone that when Palestinians, no matter if they are women, old people or children, are killed by individuals who do not have an Israeli passport, they lose importance and pass from death to oblivion. For them, no demonstrations, marches or parliamentary questions. Nafaw Salem, in a conflict that according to expert investigations has presented mass atrocities and genocide he has always sided with dictators and mass murderersbut now with a polished touch and a well-ironed toga he has forgotten his past and stands as the defender of the weak and underprivileged.

Precisely because they originally did not belong to anyone, or rather, to the Ottoman Empire which is now dissolved and then to the British mandate but it is not the case to give a history lesson in a newspaper article, they are called disputed. The Oslo Treaties, those which died during the second Intifada, tried to give a structure that would satisfy everyone but we know how it ended. In the ruling Nafaw Salem cited some areas and some Israeli settlements, the areas are those which according to the defunct Oslo Treaty should have been divided upon reaching peace, but It does not mention, and this is serious, the Palestinian settlementsalso illegal, which are built in the same areas even with funding from the European Union.

In short, a real mess that would require a dedicated essay to explain. But let’s move on. This sentence, if it were to be ratified by the UN, The uncertain Biden could forgetlately he forgets too many things, to have the veto placedwould set a chilling precedent because it could be used, always before the same court, by Greece against Turkey for the Cyprus issue. It would be funny to see two NATO nations in single combat before those judges after they had blasted each other with cannons in 1974.

TheVermilion.com is also on Whatsapp. Just click here to subscribe to the channel and always be updated (free)