The case of the heart patient from Trieste who was hospitalized was discussed at length Cattinara he allegedly denied heart surgery because he refused to get vaccinated. Four vaccinations were requested and not given: against pneumococcus, Covid, influenza and Herpes Zoster.
Much has already been written, so we won’t dwell on it, but we invite some reflection.
It must be said that the day after the newspaper published the letter from the hospital The Truth – in which it was stated verbatim that the patient was not operated on because he did not have the recommended vaccinations – the hospital tried to sort out what had happened. Not being able to deny having sent the email which also specified that the patient would be removed from the waiting lists, the facility explained that it was the heart patient himself who refused the operation and specified “that he had always followed the patient with regularity”.
Read here.
A case to clarify
It was later learned that the MP Alice BuonguerrieriFdI group leader at the commission of inquiry into Covid, presented a question to ask for clarification on the matter and request an intervention from the minister Schillaci.
Buonguerrieri wishes to ascertain whether there has been “discrimination against a fragile patient, a serious fact, in contrast with article 32 of the Constitution” and asks the minister how patients can be protected in the future.
The hypocrisy of immunosuppressed people
Given that the pandemic is over and given that there are no laws that oblige those who are about to undergo surgery to undergo the 4 disputed vaccinations, we report here some considerations collected over the years (not only from the columns of this blog). And, given the relevance, we ask parliamentarians and the minister to take it into account.
What do you most frequently get sick from in hospital, especially if you are elderly, immunosuppressed and have undergone operations? Of various bacterial infections: from staphylococci (at least 30 types), of pseudomonas (the three species that prefer humans), of various pneumonias also from pneumococcus since the vaccine covers only 9 strains but there are at least 90 in circulation, of countless even opportunistic bacteria (i.e. those that coexist in balance with us when we are healthy) and others conveyed by catheters and ducts that come into contact with the internal organs.
What can be done to prevent these epidemics of hospital infections? It would not seem sensible to vaccinate those who are planning an operation: firstly because no antibodies are produced against the disease for which they are being vaccinated up to 15/21 days after vaccination and secondly because they are immunosuppressed Of default for the same period of time. This is a physiological immunosuppression due precisely to vaccinations.
We also include this in the questions to be submitted to the minister: why in Italy there is so much insistence on the application of “various vaccination protocols” outside the law, for the elderly, immunosuppressed and fragile categories knowing full well that these practices close to hospitalization could make the sick even more fragile and do not solve the scourge of hospital infections at all?
The mystification
Some media reported the news of the Trieste patient, overshadowing the news, that is that a patient was discriminated against and deprived of a fundamental intervention for his health because he refused healthcare treatment (which is legitimate, indeed, according to informed consent, due). On the contrary, emphasis was given to the suspension of the head physician who signed the email, “due to the insults of the anti-vaxers”. Yes, from what we learn, the doctor would not have suspended himself for having affixed that signature – as a sign of apology or repentance – but because it was harshly criticized by unnamed rude people, anti-vaxxers, of course.
A handbook and pay attention
As for us, given the historical moment contested by increasingly heated ideological positions, here is the our handbook for the new year to… not make mistakes, perhaps because you are distracted by a thousand things or dazzled by mystifications.
The handbook is summarized as follows: if an alternative is not foreseen then it means that the aim is control (of the population).
Technology is increasing, made up of useful and innovative means. Will we end up with virtual money and ATM cards? It’s fine as long as the cash remains, otherwise who will protect us from clicks that empty our accounts?
Will a one-size-fits-all digital identity arrive? For the above reasons it should only be accepted if the material alternatives resist.
Vaccines for every present and future disease are increasing. A good thing as long as you are free to choose if and when to do them, at any age and in any health condition. We saw the non-alternative during Covid, are we okay with it being repeated?
Let’s ask ourselves, who among us would agree to buy a house with only an elevator and no stairs?
Last but not least:
TO all of you and new readers my best wishes for a happy new year.