In this country it’s almost fun to say you root for Donald Trump. In my environment, but also among the most unsuspecting people, if you are on the tycoon’s side they consider you shit.
When I say I would vote Trump over Kamala Harriseveryone looks at me like they looked at me in ’94 when I admitted that I wanted to vote Silvio Berlusconi. It’s the exact same thing. I am surrounded by people of all types: left, right, bourgeois, non-bourgeois. And everyone thinks I’m crazy.
Obviously on the left they consider Trump a rapist, a rapist, someone who wants to kill all immigrants. They implement one character assassination of such magnitude as I only remember it when in ’94 Berlusconi decided to take the field. I see the same supposition: the Knight was considered unfit to lead Italy, just as Trump would be unfit to guide them States United.
(…) Let me be clear: I would not vote for Trump for his ideas on the economy, abortion or civil liberties. His positions are far from liberal thought, even if they are not close to those of Harris. Anyway. If there is a good reason to choose The Donald it is the fact that he is the emblem of anti-wokism, he is the herald of anti-political correctness, the only man in opposition to that shitty America * which gave rise to Woke Universities, Pro-Pal, Cancel Culture and the tearing down of statues of slave-owning presidents.
Yet the Sheet manages to write that it is not true that Trump is the symbol of the battle against politically correct. Or at least it says so in the title. In fact, then I avidly tried to read the article to understand how they can support such a thesis, considering that on the other side there are Harris, Winfrey and that whole world. Well, I confess that I didn’t understand it. But perhaps they didn’t even know what to write.