Director Feltri,
The complaint filed by former minister Gennaro Sangiuliano against Maria Rosaria Boccia seems to tell truths that are profoundly different from those that the Pompeian has been feeding us in recent weeks. Two facts in particular shock me: Mrs. Boccia allegedly dug her nails into the man’s living flesh, which resulted in a visible wound on his forehead, which we all noticed when Gennaro appeared on TV. Of course, we didn’t imagine that it was Boccia who caused that cut, which I would have attributed to a blade rather than human nails. Boccia herself, as can be seen from reading the chats attached to the complaint, admits what she did and that she was a hyena. The other fact that shocks me is that the influencer made Sangiuliano believe she was pregnant, that she was expecting his child. The goal was evidently to exert psychological pressure on the man, to manipulate him, to control him. This horrifies me. Sometimes I think that women are no better than men. Maybe sometimes they are even worse. And I say this as a woman.
Dear Francesca,
there are different forms of violence, for example there is physical violence and there is psychological violence, and neither of these two is the exclusive prerogative of the male sex, although certain gender stereotypes are dominant, such as that of the male executioner and that of the female victim, which are strenuously defended by the standardized thought of the left. In the case of Maria Rosaria Boccia, to whom you refer, it seems that the lady from Pompeii was skilled in using both one and the other violence without scruples of any kind, that is, both physical and psychological. Of course, these conducts will have to be verified and confirmed by the judiciary and we defend the principle of the presumption of innocence, even that of Maria Rosaria. However, the evidence attached to the complaint made by Sangiuliano appears clear and serious and we have the right to comment on them.
It will be difficult for Boccia to contradict the former minister, especially since the written dialogues between the two reveal both that the physical violence, namely the aggression with the nails with which Boccia slashed Gennaro’s forehead, was admitted by the woman, and that the latter revealed to the minister that she was expecting a child from him. In this latter case, only if Boccia were able to demonstrate that she was actually pregnant or at least that she herself was convinced at that moment that she was pregnant following a specific test that she should show, then she could assert her good faith. Otherwise, we could only conclude that the aspiring councilor insinuated this idea in Gennaro, that of becoming a father, in order to induce him to do what she would have wanted him to do or in any case to make him vulnerable, blackmailable, to put him emotionally in check.
I must confess that I am amazed by Boccia’s Machiavellian ability, who also tries to convey to the public opinion the image of a fragile, kind, sweet, delicate person, unjustly deceived by the powerful male. We have seen her on television composed, calm, all buttoned up. Of course, she has never put meat on the fire and has made a lot of smoke, but who among us could have imagined that that lady with the composed attitude could be capable of cutting the limbs of a human being with her nails? But what the hell does Boccia have in place of fingers, perhaps slicers or scissors?
Today I see Gennaro Sangiuliano for what he is: not yet another ogre, or toxic male, who made fun of an unwary girl by deluding her with the mirage of a job to take her to bed or to keep her happy; but rather a male victim of violence and manipulation by a woman who is anything but foolish and gullible, an adult and vaccinated woman, 41 years old, who appears to have already used the strategy of fake pregnancy in the past, a woman who had precise and clear goals and objectives and who probably pretended to be in love and involved in order to achieve them.
A woman who, the moment she realized that she would not get what she was looking for, began to persecute the unfortunate man, to threaten him, to blackmail him, to put pressure on him, to the point, in a fit of anger, of physically hurting him, which is nothing compared to the deception of telling a man that he will become a father when this is not true at all.
This man was devoured and spat out. And let no one explain to us that the weak part is always and only the female.