In my virtual Easter egg I found a doubt. A doubt, which I fully share, regarding the obscure story linked to the attack in Moscow. She expressed it masterfully Federico Rampini in connection with Giovanni Floris' television lounge. These are his words: “The only truly suspicious thing is the fact that in Moscow, that evening, the police were invisible, non-existent.”
Despite the warnings raised by the Americans two weeks earlier; despite the fact that ISIS exists, that ISIS is a permanent threat. ISIS committed a massacre in Iran two months ago, because for ISIS we are all enemies: the West, Russia and Iran as a Shiite. How is this possible – asks Rampini – in a country subjected to a regime of permanent police repression, where any form of dissent, even harmless, in the streets is immediately struck by police intervention, there in that mass gathering, at a concert, the police weren't there? Well, there are many questions, but all questions converge on the figure of Putin, on his responsibility or his inability; or on the desire to let things happen that he then intends to exploit against Ukraine.
Now, this last option immediately seemed more plausible to me, precisely in consideration of what the Genoese journalist said. Having made the necessary proportions, the massacre in Moscow brought to mind the assassination of Kirov, an emerging character during the first phase of Stalinism, who now seems clear that he was eliminated from the GPU by order of the Georgian dictator himself. The fact is that his death was used as a pretext to begin the long and dramatic purges with which Stalin eliminated any opposition, sending millions of convinced communists to their deaths.