Instanded for about twenty days, the second American administration led by Donald Trump is already creating messy and polarizing the debate globally. The shooting of The Donaldfrom the annexation of Greenland to that of Canada, passing through the purchase of Gaza are added to the old “Trumpian” battle horses, such as the duties against the EU and China, and the desire to restore a dialogue with the Russia of Vladimir Putin . Understanding how concrete there is, in the threats and promises of the whips of the White House and how much it can be contextualized in the framework of an unscrupulous negotiating strategy, risks being complicated. What is certain, however, is that trying to analyze the new presidency with the categories that were used until 2021 (i.e. until the end of the first term of tycoon), as many are still doing, risks being wrong. The world, in fact, has changed profoundly since then. The long wave of the Covid-19 pandemic and the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East have shaken the global order at a level whose scope will not be measurable except in the medium and long term. Trump himself represents, today, interests and forces partially different from those who had launched the first ride, forces that would be absolutely illusory to believe can be contained and controlled by a single “strong man”.
If the “dark enlightenment” and its capitals replace the Woke Armamentary
If the first Trump, theoutsider who initially leaned on the enigmatic consultant Steve Bannon but who was then forced to take ahead with figures of establishment The most traditional republican party, such as John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Nikki Haley, proposed (at least in terms of propaganda) as a spokesperson for the so-called “sovereign international”, alternating, however and in fact, a confused anti-system rhetoric with consolidated methods imprint power management neoconthe current one, on the other hand, seems enormously strengthened in his relationship with the elite Great Old Party, So much so that it can be allowed a greater autonomy of maneuver, thanks to the support of the increasingly influential current Sorceress (“Make America Great Again“) And, above all, of the powerful exponents of the Silicon Valley who, in the wake of Elon Musk, went up to the” wagon of the winner “. Just Musk represents the most interesting reading key of the revisited Trumpism, which, through the proximity of the patron of Tesla but also of the co-founder of Paypal and investor of Facebook Peter Thiel, winks at the “dark enlightenment”, that is, to that current of Anglo -Saxon thought which, as a sort of dystopia cyberpunk Of the nineties, he blends into it elements of transhumanist futurism, reactionary and anti-democratic elitism and which, just like in a dystopian story, seems today able to create science fiction domain plans thanks to immense availability of technology and capital. What, however, unites the “new Trump” to the “old” is the will to relaunch and preserve American hegemony, but overcoming and at the same time the structures and rituals of the world globalism children of that same hegemony. American exceptionalism, in Trump, does not materialize in the project of a “pedagogy of the world” to strokes of colored revolutions and progressive propaganda to ride of theUSAIDof National Endowment for Democracy And of many other similar structures but also of the so -called “capitalism Woke”, but in a will of power based on a rhetoric and a muscle practice, marked by a negotiating pragmatism free from ideological motivations and palingenenetic fantasies.
Ukraine: can you really be an agreement with Moscow?
Precisely on these bases, an agreement with Moscow could be found, even if it may not be enough to solve the differences on Ukraine. To detect this difference in scenario, compared to what happened with Biden, recently and among others, also the deputy director of the Center for the European and international comprehensive studies of theHSE University of MoscowDmitry Suslov, who in an interview with Fanpage.it he said that “For the tradition of the Democratic Party, exceptionalism represents the idea that the United States are a lighthouse of universal values, the ‘shining city on the hill’ destined to transform the world. But Trump’s version is very different. For him, it is only a question of affirming American greatness: economic primacy, military domain and global hegemony. No liberal values. (…) And this is positive, because the power policy that Russia promotes and has always promoted: a world governed by some great powers that entertain competitive and/or cooperative with each other legitimate. Without liberal nonsense ” (the term “liberal” must be read here in the sense of “liberal“, NDA).
The collapse of every illusion on the EU, avant -garde of World Cup
“Nonsense “those contemptuously paid by Suslov, which, on the other hand, remain the reference ideology of the European Union. Which, if during the first presidency Trump had squeezed in Moscow (arriving, even and through the French president Emmanuel Macron, to hypothesize collaborations in the military), today he interrupted with Putin every dialogue, having transformed the Support for Ukraine in a deployment of civilizations, on the side (in the ideas of the bureaucrats of Brussels) of the democratic and progressive West against the “barbarism” of Eurasian autocrazies. Under the guidance of Ursula von der Leyen (and like those who write here he already hypothesized in 2019) the EU abandoned any ambition of autonomy with respect to the so -called profound state of Washington in general and to the executive centers of World Cup in particular, being avant -garde of projects Dirers with strong ideological value such as the one on the ecological transition: illusions and masks have fallen and united Europe has been confirmed on the one hand as a simple re -proposal in civil clothes of the BORN and, on the other, how longa manus of Anglo-Mondialist forms such as the World Economic Forumalready “patron” of the “great reset”. Roles that, after all, the EU has always had, since probably constituted for this purpose, in spite of those who had deluded themselves in the opposite direction in the four -year period between 2017 and 2021.
Which sides for Brussels?
Russia is definitively lost (which now seems to share with Trump the desire to weaken the EU, towards which the Kremlin apparently lost any expectation), community Europe, besieged internally by the increasingly influential “Atlantic Falks” such as the countries of the Baltic and Poland (these latter natural allies of Trumpism), will be able to find, in its difficult relationship with the new White House, the bank of Canada, the United Kingdom and the Finance, on certain dossierof the People’s Republic of China, which has always promoted respect for multilateralism and, above all, of that economic globalization (against each duty) which was one of the main engines of its rise.