In a nutshell, it could be said that the choice of Trumpinsane for a liberalto use the tool of duties to remedy some objective internal imbalances, including excessive commercial deficit and the equally excessive state debt (debt considered already unsustainable by Elon Musk), represents the classic Wrong answer to a real problem.
Now, given that military spending currently represents 15% of the colossal state expenditure (over 6,000 billion dollars), a fair response, in reality, the tycoon had given it by announcing a certain hallway on the global level and consequently, forcing Europe to deal directly with its safety.
Move that then arose in the Resto Plan announced by Ursula von der Leyen.
However, probably on the hunt for a result that can be spent on the level of consent, especially after his mediation on the war fronts in which he had committed himself by putting his face-the Russian-Ukraine one and the Middle Eastern one-has become bogged down, Trump has decided to make a big voiceby imposing a tax – because this is – on an avalanche of imported goods. A tax that, you must not be a Nobel Prize to the economy to understand it, first of all it will return against the US economic system, creating the conditions for further growth in inflation, but above all, given the extreme importance of the American market, it will determine a whole series of worrying recessive effects globally Due to which all economic systems – part of an increasingly integrated economy – will have to lose.
In reality, at the bottom of this gluttonous economic interest that everyone, Europe of the Soviet of the regulation including, claim to chat that they want to protect there is a colossal conviction of stone which, in the West, must be underlined, only the current tenant of the White House has repeatedly stigmatized with emphasis, both in the election campaign and in the role of the supreme head: the excess of public spending.
In this sense, to put it in poor words, the much mistreated globalizationif on the one hand it has allowed a multitude of individuals to get out of absolute poverty, increasing the well -being of the citizens of the old world, on the other hand, has increased considerably the quantities of tax resources and, therefore, of the expense of the individual governments.
Well, from this point of view, the duties of Trump, albeit in their economic myopia, put even more naked the difficulties of ours systems cheapcalled to finance through an increasingly oppressive taxation the aforementioned excess of public spending, which seriously risk falling into the hell of the underdevelopment. In this sense, despite any political force in the hunt for votes this represents a taboo, I do not think that there is an alternative to a constant, albeit gradual, reduction of the amount of resources controlled and spent by individual states.
TheVermilion.com is also on WhatsApp. Simply click here to register for the channel and always be updated (free).