– Second Scott Turow “Charlie Kirk’s murder is the son of extremism fueled by the right”. Feel, make us the favor of ending it. We do not yet know well why Kirk’s killer pressed the trigger, but we know that pointing the finger against the victim’s ideas or Trump’s ideas makes no sense. Nobody. By now if the police kill a black, it is the fault of the right. If a madman kills students in a college, it is the fault of the weapons of the right. If one who praised “Bella Ciao” kills a right of the right, it is always the fault of the right. But make us pleasure, come on. Try at least a minimum of empathy for that man, father of the family, who is now underlying a pit.
– Look that the story of Fidene’s child beaten to sprang by three minors rom (small, under 14 years) is sensational. And above all it is after what happened in Milan to that poor woman overwhelmed by the car led by the nomadic kids. Is it just a coincidence? Are only two cases? No, unfortunately. And maybe the time has come to find a solution.
– Lilli Gruberspeaking of his Eight and a half: “Last season was the best ever, the goal is to repeat us with our formula: critical journalism, relevance to facts, no propaganda and accurate analysis”. There is an amazingly allowed to disagree. Critical journalismbut mainly invites one -way guests. Relevance to the factsobviously excluding the opinions on which the program is based. Accurate analysiseven these most sinister than right. Legitimate, let’s be clear: everyone does it. But does not come to make us lesson on how journalism is done with “Constitution, democratic values and professional correctness”. Eddai. It makes a left program, for a left -wing electorate, defending progressive theses: why not say it clearly?
– he says Gruber: “I am a journalist, not politics”. Except, however, having made a period from MEPs elected on the lists of the Olivo. Speaking of relevance to accurate facts and analysis, we said.
– I would like to point out that a president of some country, in this case Donald Trumpbecomes autocrates when he modifies the democratic functioning of a state and transforms it to his liking. Whatever Gruber and Saviano & Co say, this in the United States did not happen. Donald uses the same identical powers granted to Joe Biden, only that he does it to follow his legitimate political plan instead of satisfying the progressive desired. I share everything he does? No. Did you make a mistake in hunting some reporters from the White House? Yes. But I did not hear poor Lilli screaming with terror when Zuckerberg denounced the pressure of Biden to censor the “not very aligned” news on Covid. Wasn’t that from self -consoles?
– Cazzullo’s question to Gruber: “The photo of Piazza Tiananmen, with the satrapies of the world united against the West, scares her? Or did we build that photo?”. Was it so difficult to ask you about D’Alema also?
– There is a myth that must be dispelled. It is not true that “the rights” want the destruction of Europe and that nationalisms are “dangerously undermining the EU”, as Lilli says. The “right”, not all of them but that of Meloni and Vox surely yes, want another Europe, different, built on peoples and not on bureaucratic superstructures. And this is “legitimate”, dear Lilli, not “dangerous”.
– Today the column looks like a monographic on Gruber but the interview gives many ideas. The journalist says that in Italy “the economy does not collapse but cows” and that “the average class is depleted”. Ok. But when there was Mario Draghi, were we better? No. End of history.
– Do you know why the story of the Romanian bandit drives me crazy who runs away investing a policeman in Vicenza? Not only because the poor road agent, who had intercepted the man, is seriously injured and will have to pass a long convalescence. Not only because only by miracle the dead man did not escape. But because the criminal in question did not go crazy at any moment, which obviously would not just justify the act, but it seems to be a gentleman already known to the police and “Formally” under house arrest. Formally. Except that while “formally” he should have remained at home to serve his sentence, he stole a car in Rho (in the Milanese), he put under a policeman, stole another vehicle leaving the owner in shock after an illness, then he also took possession of a van and finally disappeared who knows where. But “formally” was under house arrest.
Now the question is one: but why a gentleman, with precedents but without any problem evidently to stain in other crimes, was only “formally” under house arrest? The agent is not dead and is a fortune. But from his convalescence he has the right to ask himself: why wasn’t a guy behind bars?