The association between the division of labor and military interventionism of state is not standing. The Weberian monopoly of legal violence does not result from logic of peaceful cooperation, while I turn to the butcher or the brewer within a legal framework based on property rights. Those who therefore invite the warfond to go to the front are perfectly right (they use their bodies and/or their money), while it makes no sense to claim that “everyone has to do their job” or that “as I do not produce cheeses, in the same way I don’t have to fight firsthand”.
States are not market companies, but oppression systemsand the military interventionism of those who claim to decide that others fight in non -defensive wars dilated the range of action. In fact, military interventionism not only attributes legitimacy to the winning mafia (the state), but even gives it the task of saving this or that community even very far away on the basis of completely arbitrary evaluations: it is Taiwan, Hong Kong, Romania that suspend democracy or the totalitarian Venezuela.
I add that for the same reason I would never want Italy to intervene militarily in support of the Scottish or Flemish secessionists, even if I look forward to those projects of political disintegration. I could possibly send them my money: this yes.
TheVermilion.com is also on WhatsApp. Simply click here to register for the channel and always be updated (free)