– I read the analyses Republic on the vote and I understand that, as usual, instead of “analyzing” the facts they bend them to their hopes. Only to then pretend to be surprised once things go wrong. He explains to me, Annalisa Cuzzocreahow can he claim that victory in Puglia And Campania it is “the victory of the primaries” of Schlein against Conte? Can excelling in two regions that the center-left already governed, giving one to the M5S, i.e. Campania, really be considered the signal that “the very wide field works”? Perhaps my colleague has forgotten that the same coalition led to the defeat in Calabriain the Marche and Liguria (just to name three). And that since the government has been in power, the sum of the regional elections brings the count to 13 center-right versus 6 center-left.
– I read from various places that the center-right would have “lost in the SouthBut then I look at the map and I notice that (if we consider “South” from Abruzzo downwards, and we also include the Islands, 5 are governed by the centre-right and 3 by the centre-left. Do you want to remove Abruzzo and Molise? We are 3 to 3. In any case, the left does not win.
– It seems that the center-right has pulled the handbrake on the law on consent “free and current” to have sex. Let’s hope they go all the way and change the wording of that rule which is and remains aberrant.
– If you want to understand why it is aberrant, read the interview from a few days ago with the president of the Court of Milan. Exulting over the new law, he says: “I as a public prosecutor in front of a woman who presents herself to report or who testifies to having been subjected to a sexual act without her consent, I find myself faced with news of a crime and I have to believe her.” Not only that: “Naturally it will be necessary to verify the conditions in which the sexual act was consummated. Obviously we won’t get to the point of asking for written consent, but let’s say that from now on this is a problem that concerns men.” And again: “If I were a prosecutor, in front of a woman who told me she had been raped, the proof is already there. Then naturally it will have to be evaluated in the hearing. Let’s say that if the man is not sure of the woman’s consent, he would be better off abstaining.”
– I don’t know if it’s clear to you. With the new law, which will be interpreted by these magistrates, if a woman says “he raped me” the prosecutor “must believe her” regardless of the context, of the investigations to be carried out. So it is “a problem that concerns men” to make sure, while having sex, to find a way to demonstrate that consent was free and above all current. That is, says Roia, even “during sexual intercourse“. How to do it? Well. Maybe a video. Maybe an audio. Who knows. But we have to find a way, dear boys, because – says the robe – when faced with a woman who claims to have suffered violence, “the proof is already there”. So it’s up to you to dismantle it. It’s up to you to refute it. And with these people evaluating the counter-deductions, you can be sure that there will be trouble. In fact, you know what the magistrate’s advice is: abstain. Avoid it. At most, we add, there is always the good old autoerotism in front of porn films Obviously with it Spid.
– What then was I thinking… the only positive note can be seen by those in bed who, let’s say, cannot boast very long-lasting performances. The less it lasts relationship sexualIn fact, the less time the partner has to change her mind. Premature ejaculation will save you.
– Clear Ferragni he has already paid enough.
The Pandoro Gate was a scandal, but calling it a “scam” is too much. He deceived consumers and paid a very high fine for this, as well as various compensations and donations. I would say that staging a criminal trial seems exaggerated to me. And out of time.