Whoever spits on the top in Alaska had told us that Putin was dead

It comes to smile, after the summit, listen to the most quoted commentators to argue that “the Alaska outcome was easily predictable”, when until a few hours before they fantasized about “historical summit” (Corriere della …

Whoever spits on the top in Alaska had told us that Putin was dead

It comes to smile, after the summit, listen to the most quoted commentators to argue that “the Alaska outcome was easily predictable”, when until a few hours before they fantasized about “historical summit” (Corriere della Sera). And I keep silent about the lands-row (once from Ukraine, another of Alaska and, if the meeting had taken place on the moon, they would have been terrane of the moon) that since Trump was elected they have occupied the titles of the best-selling Italian and foreign newspapers. They knew the Abicì of chemistry, they would know that the lands are not rare.

The fact – in my humble opinion – is as follows. We have all lived in a parallel world, told by art art and unified networks that, after 8 years – from 2014 to 2021 – of guilty silence, and subsequent three years – from 2022 to 2024 – during which it has indoctrinated us on the story of a war that does not exist (the story, not the war), cannot do, as if it were to say, self -criticism. Also think of language: “historical summit” and all the other things passed off as “historic” the minute after they happened or even, as the case of ‘I’m summit, even before they happened. How much prosopope: it does not suck him that one thing is dicible “historical” if at least thirty years have passed since his event. Or not?

Nobody who had followed the facts. After the 8 -year -old silence, they fantasized about the Russian president on the point of death and sick. Which was not only false but, above all, irrelevant: in the absence of Putin, there are always 150 million Russians, which is beautifully ignored. However, Putin was there, alive and in great shape, in Alaska. We do not know what he said he was with Trump, but we know the words he pronounced at the conference-stam. Words as a true head of state, responsible and human, as we will soon notice.

And then they fantasized by playing a single rope like a broken disc: “There is an attacker and an attacked”, a obtuse Manichea vision of a more complex reality. Although, all in all, simple and reducible to minimum terms, if only you want. And it is Putin to say it in his speech at the conference-stapus: “We have always considered the Ukrainian nation, and I have said it several times, a sister nation”, words that reticents for 8 years and liars for 3 years would be able to easily peel. If it were not that it is the Russian president himself who adds: «As strange as it may seem in these conditions. We have the same roots and all that is happening is a tragedy for us, a terrible wound ». The three -year Manicheum story does not hold up. Because, Putin insists, “it is necessary to eliminate all the primary causes – on other occasions he had called them” deep roots ” – of that conflict”.

Tacco of the words by exalted on the destroyed Russian war machine; And I also keep silent of the ilars words on the Russian tanks who took the spare parts from domestic washing machines. But we cannot be silent and not to remember that they fantasized, up to the obsession, of “just peace”. Which of course does not mean anything, since the only just peace is the one that can be stipulated now, immediately. As? Putin for years has been repeating it and has also repeated it in Alaska: it is necessary to “consider all the legitimate concerns of Russia, agreeing that of course the safety of Ukraine must also be guaranteed”. In short, the guarantees of security at stake have followed – as we have also written here for over three years – not to the safety of Ukraine (and, less than less than Europe), but to the safety of Russia.

In my article on “The truth” I anticipated that not the two presidents would not be spoken of business. The main of which, I wrote, will not be the offer of Trump in Putin of the lands-widening lands by the mainstream media, but “could be the offer of Putin a Trump of the joint exploitation of arctic resources, given that over half of the arctic coast is from Russia, while the USA are only in Alaska”. That things are confirmed that Di Putin’s words are confirmed: «We believe that Arctic cooperation is also very possible, in our international context. For example, between the Far East of Russia and the western coast of the United States ».

What about Trump’s words? These are words that seem to agree with our conjecture of the parallel world in which the media narrative made us live. Here they are: “We have been hindered by the media frame on” Russia, Russia, Russia “. This made things a little more difficult, but Vladimir understood it. I think he probably saw things like that during his career. He saw everything. But we had to endure the hoax on “Russia, Russia, Russia”. He knew he was a hoax, and I knew it was a hoax, but what was done was very criminal, and made it more difficult for us to treat as a country ».

Franco Battaglia

TheVermilion.com is also on WhatsApp. Simply click here to register for the channel and always be updated (free).