– There’s no point in denying it, today’s news is the investigation against Will be Judge And In the Trocchia on charges of violence sexual on a colleague. Now, go and read the story as it happened in the news. Here we are interested in the comment. Let’s start from a premise: the correspondent of Clean Square and the chronicler of the Tomorrow are innocent until proven guilty. And we care little if the prosecutor filed a motion to dismiss the case, if the alleged victim objected, or if during the investigation they really forgot to question the party in question, that is, the complainant. Here we are interested in a constitutional principle: anyone accused remains innocent until proven guilty. And we apply it to everyone: to Sara Giudice, to Nello Trocchia, to Giovanni Toti, Ciro Grillo and Leonardo La Russa. The Tomorrow And Clean Squareunfortunately, cannot say the same.
– Remember the case of Leonardo There Russian? Here are three articles published on Tomorrow: “Dear La Russa, even a father can condemn rape“; “La Russa case. Children need education on consent, not ‘slaps’ in the family“. To which I add the piece by Conrad Formsalways on the Tomorrowin which he pointed the finger at La Russa, the father “entangled in the affair of his son Leonardo Apache” and guilty “the day after the girl’s complaint” of having “attacked her for having snorted cocaine” and of having “acquitted his son directly and without a trial, after having ‘interrogated’ him”. Why are we quoting them? Because these three articles were written a few days after the news of the young woman’s complaint against La Russa’s son. And all three articles started from the assumption that Leonardo was guilty, not innocent. If we applied the “method Tomorrow” and the “Formigli method” to today’s case, we should take the alleged victim’s version as valid and consider Trocchia-Giudice two rapists. Instead, we will not do so, because we are different. We are not alternating license plate vigilantes.
– What if the alleged rapist is a woman or a leftist? Always after the La Russa case, Chiara Valerio wrote a delirious piece (with the sentence still far from being pronounced) to condemn “the myth of the right of the male who never makes mistakes”. Good. We await tomorrow a learned piece to explain the myth of the left-wing male and woman who certainly cannot have made mistakes. Ready?
– Remember the case of Fausto Brizziexposed to public ridicule after accusations of sexual harassment by some actresses? Here. Here too: if we applied the same method…
– Apparently the two journalists, through their lawyers, will proceed to counter-denounce the girl alleged victim of violence for slander. It is legal and legitimate, if they believe they are right. However, I remember rivers and rivers of news written and published on the importance of not falling into “secondary victimization” and on the importance of “always believing those who find the courage to report”. Why, this time, does #MeToo not count?
– There are some details that need to be highlighted in the interview given by Manfred Weberthe great leader of the EPP, yesterday came down to Rome to talk to Giorgia Meloni. First: Weber in Italy only talks to the prime minister and Tajani, Salvini practically doesn’t even mention him. Second: the Belpaese deserves an executive vice-presidency of the EU because “Meloni and Tajani got a lot of votes in the European elections, unlike Macron and Scholz who came out as the big losers”. We’ll see.
– Interesting interview with the mediator of the Qatar who is negotiating on the Israel-Hamas table and who knows the Russia-Ukraine one. I’ll summarize it for you because the content is entirely written in diplomatic legalese. Brutal but truthful summary: forget about peace for now. The end.
– Antonio Tajani slams the door in the face of those who ask to allow Italian weapons to be used on Russian soil. Wise choice.
– The Democratic Party is a huge swing. When Renzi was secretary, the left-wingers like Bersani And Hope they left slamming the door. Then at a certain point Renzi also left the PD, to try to break through to the center (and he didn’t break through at all). Now those who had left from the left have returned to the PD. And soon Renzi, who left not long ago, is preparing to sign an alliance. Now, my fellow Democrats… Can you explain to me how a voter can vote for this great unity knowing that until the day before yesterday you were all butting heads?
– Ps: the speech, moreover, does not even take into account the fact that to win the “wide field” must also include the grillini, i.e. Conte, i.e. Travaglio. Let’s do well.
– A Dad Franciswho claims that “rejecting is a sin”, we can only believe. He is still His Holiness. The point is that here no one wants to “chase away”, “reject” or “not welcome” immigrants. Here we must look at the problem from three points of view. First: no one denies the need to welcome the needy, but according to the capabilities of each country and above all respecting the laws. After all, he also said it Pope John Paul II: “It is the responsibility of public authorities to exercise control over migratory flows in consideration of the needs of the common good. Reception must always be carried out in compliance with the laws and therefore combined, when necessary, with the firm repression of abuses”. Second: Bergoglio contradicts himself when he launches the anathema against “those who constantly work to reject migrants” and at the same time asks to “expand safe and regular access routes for migrants, facilitating refuge for those fleeing wars”. If we must fight human trafficking, in fact, there is only one possible way: cutting off their business, therefore stopping the boats. Third: the Pontiff’s speech starts from an erroneous assumption, according to which all migrants who arrive on boats or along the Balkan route are said to be fleeing war. This is not the case, the numbers say so. For economic migrants there is the “right not to emigrate” (Ratzinger), therefore it is necessary to create the conditions so that they do not have to leave their country. Do not let them take to the sea.
– A great player, with a great manager, does not necessarily automatically become a good coach. We have known many cases, praised by the sports press on the benches of Milan, Inter and Juve, only to find them in subsequent years sacked on the third day by Sampdoria in Serie B. We are talking about Pirlo.
– Don’t be fooled by the NGO. The numbers certify that the greater the number of departures of small boats from the shores of Africa, the more serious the massacre in the Mediterranean. Today Casalini & co. claim that the “percentage number” of deaths has increased, but this is statistical masturbation. When a shipwreck occurs, only the count of victims counts. Not the percentage incidence on the total departures.
– On the single allowance, it is necessary to ring the bell of the fact checkers always ready to check the journalists’ hairs in the egg
rednecks and populists. Read the article by Republicwhich does not adequately report the fact that it is actually the EU that wants to kill the single allowance, we think that the piece deserves at least the “out of context” label. No?