The psychological technique used to make public opinion accept it direct entry into war it is that of frog boiled. It is essentially based on two elements: fear and reassurance.
Quiet frogs in the pot: no one wants war, it is only done to scare the enemy a little for what he has done, with sanctions and sending weapons. The water in the pot is still warm.
Fear the possibility of war nuclear and reassure by saying that at most nuclear weapons will be used but “only” conventional and “only” for defensive purposes. But this is only a distant hypothesis. The frog still finds the water temperature pleasant overall.
Fear sending soldiers and reassure by saying that we will send “only” trainers. The temperature begins to rise here. Fear a direct conflict with Russia and reassure by saying that we will allow the Ukrainians to strike on Russian territory with our weapons but “only” if they are military targets. The temperature now bothers the frog, the heat rises slowly but you can feel it.
We will have to send soldiersbut don't worry, “only” professionals… then we will have to send them too conscript soldiers, but don't worry, they will be protected in the tanks, not with the rifle in the trenches. Then they will die, but don't worry, they did it for all of us. The frog is now weakened and is no longer able to react to the now truly excessive temperature.
There Russia after invading Ukraine he would have invaded us too. There were no alternatives. We had to invade Russia. (And to think we've already done it and it didn't go very well). The frog is cooked.
And so, little by little, public opinion was prepared to accept the beginning of third World war, because a war against Russia can only represent this. There is no two without three. At this point the frog is cooked.
The question is: will we still be there after? Or in the end will we all (or almost all) be boiled dead frogs?
TheVermilion.com is also on Whatsapp. Simply click here to subscribe to the channel and always be updated (free).